All players
Julian Champagnie

Julian
Champagnie

Efficient Shooting
15.4 PRA avg
-2.3 vs 30-game avg → Stable

Efficient Shooting. TS% 60%. Above league-average TS%.

Production near baseline. No strong signal either way.

→ Stable

INTELLIGENCE BRIEFING

Signals are derived from the last 5 games compared against a 30-game rolling baseline. Context factors in schedule, matchup, and usage.

Efficient Shooting

TS% 60%. Above league-average TS%.

Below Rhythm

Marginal underperformance vs season average

Road Game
2% 30+ pts

Full rest entering tonight and above-average shooting efficiency lift the ceiling; below-average output run is the main drag.

Rest Advantage
Neutral Matchup
Standard road game.

PERFORMANCE RECORD

PRA per game 30-game avg (17.7)
25
18p · 5r · 2a
6/12 FG · 6x3
· 33m
04 Apr
18
7p · 9r · 2a
3/6 FG · 1x3
· 27m
06 Apr
9
2p · 4r · 3a
1/6 FG · 0x3
2b · 27m
08 Apr
12
7p · 4r · 1a
3/7 FG · 1x3
1b 1to · 25m
12 Apr
13
6p · 5r · 2a
2/3 FG · 2x3
3s 1b 1to · 30m
19 Apr
Date PTS REB AST PRA FG 3P STL BLK TO MIN
04 Apr 18 5 2 25 6/12 6/9 0 0 0 33
06 Apr 7 9 2 18 3/6 1/4 0 0 0 27
08 Apr 2 4 3 9 1/6 0/3 0 2 0 27
12 Apr 7 4 1 12 3/7 1/4 0 1 1 25
19 Apr 6 5 2 13 2/3 2/3 3 1 1 30

What NLTS sees in this data

Efficient Shooting: TS% 60%. Above league-average TS%. Last game PRA was -2.3 vs the 30-game baseline (17.7).

Averages from last 5 games
8
5.4
2
15.4
60.0%
League avg ~57.5% · Last 30 games
10.9%
Standard · Last 30 games
Moderate
PRA variance · Last 10 games

PLAYER ANALYSIS

→ Stable
  • Julian Champagnie has been consistent in his recent performances, averaging 11.8 points, 3.8 rebounds, and 1.4 assists over his last five games while shooting 44.4% from the field and 40% from three-point range.

  • With no recent headlines indicating changes in team dynamics or personal issues, his steady output suggests that he is effectively integrating into the Spurs' offensive schemes.

As the Spurs prepare to face the San Antonio Spurs, he could see an uptick in opportunities, making him a player to watch for potential increased scoring output in that matchup.

FGM 6
FGA 12
FG% 50.0%
TS% 60.0%
3PM 6
3PA 9
3P% 66.7%
FTM 0
FTA 0
FT% 0.0%
Steals 0
Blocks 0
Turnovers 0
Fouls 0
Minutes 33
+/- 2
USG% 10.9%